Bad news first: The Phillies and utility middle infielder Juan Castro have agreed to a deal, pending a physical. The deal is reported to be worth less than $1 million. Todd Zolecki simply labeled him “Bruntlett’s replacement,” and, frankly, he’s a little too Bruntlett-y for me. Castro’s career line is .230/.270/.332. In 15 MLB seasons, he has never posted an OPS+ higher than 84 (remember, 100 is league average). He has had an OBP over .300 only twice. One of those seasons has a 5 plate appearance sample size, and the other was 2009, a career year for Castro, in which he posted a .277/.311/.339 line with one home run. Yes, I said career year. Ruben Amaro no doubt hopes Castro will repeat that production in 2010, on the cheap. What Amaro may not have noticed is that Castro’s 2009 came with a .345 BABIP, a full 80 points above his career average. His line drive percentage was significantly higher than in previous seasons, so some of that is attributable to simply hitting the ball harder, but it would be ridiculous to expect him to get that lucky again. He’s going to regress.
There’s also a deeper front office philosophy at work here, the same philosophy that resulted in Eric Bruntlett. It’s the notion that it does not matter in the slightest how bad your backup middle infielder’s bat is, because he is primarily a defensive replacement. I don’t have a problem with defense-oriented bench players, but if you’re a front office, you do need to make sure that their defense actually makes up for their total lack of offensive contribution. Castro has been good at second and short throughout his career – UZRs of 13.5 and 6.1, respectively. If you look at the last three years, there are some indications that his defense is declining with age, but the sample sizes are not high enough for UZR to be reliable. I can tell you this: If Castro’s offense makes the expected regression in 2010, and his fielding remains about the same or he loses a step to old age, he will not be above replacement level. Don’t think that his status as a defensive replacement will prevent him from getting enough plate appearances to bottom out his value either. He will certainly be used to give Jimmy Rollins and Chase Utley days off, and will see pinch hit opportunities when Charlie’s options are limited. Just ask Eric Bruntlett, who saw the plate 118 times in 2009 and 238 times in 2008.
There are more middle infielder free agents that could be signed relatively cheaply. In fact, here is a chart full of them. These players all made $2 million or less in 2009. Yes, some of them would want raises in 2010. And yes, some of them have simply average or even below average defense. But most have some competence at the plate. Some of them can even post an OBP over .300! (Did I mention that Castro has done that only twice? I’m pretty sure I did.) For most of them, when you combine their bat and their glove, you will find they are more valuable than Juan Castro. And that is the point – you don’t need to forget about any kind of offensive ability and find an elite defender for your backup middle infielder. You just need to be sure that the combined value of his offense and defense is worth more than replacement level. I suspect this will not be the case for Juan Castro, but for Ruben’s sake and ours, let’s hope that it is.
The Good News
Word comes via MLB Trade Rumors that the Phillies are indeed going after Adrian Beltre to fill the third base position. As I wrote in my offseason priorities post, Beltre is probably the best third base option for the Phils. He is possibly the best defensive third basemen in the game, and his offense is likely to be rebound from an injury-hampered 2009. He is a clear upgrade over Pedro Feliz, and could be had for a reasonable salary. It would behoove Rube not to be shy in doling out a significant amount of those newly-minted Citizens Bank Park greenbacks to get him; he is a wise investment.
Also, as I am writing this, news has arrived that Phillies have signed Wilson Valdez and DeWayne Wise. The 2010 bench is taking shape. I’ll post some thoughts on that later.